Satoshi mystery rewinds to 1997

June 18, 2026

In partnership with

 

Reading time: 5 minutes

CME to sue CFTC over crypto perps

Key points:

  • CME Group plans to sue the CFTC over its approval of Bitcoin perpetual futures for Kalshi.

  • CEO Terrence Duffy argued that perps should be treated as swaps under Dodd-Frank, not futures.

News - CME Group is preparing to sue the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) after the regulator cleared Bitcoin perpetual futures for U.S.-regulated platforms, setting up a major fight over one of crypto’s most active trading products.

Outgoing CEO Terrence Duffy told CNBC that CME would file the lawsuit on June 18, arguing that perpetual futures do not fit the legal definition of futures under the Dodd-Frank Act. According to Duffy, contracts involving periodic payment exchanges between two parties should be classified as swaps, which carry different clearing, reporting, and venue requirements.

The dispute followed the CFTC’s late-May approval of Kalshi’s Bitcoin perpetual futures product, marking the first time perps were allowed on a U.S.-regulated exchange. Coinbase was also cleared to connect U.S. customers to offshore perps.

Why this matters - Perps have long been central to offshore crypto trading, with one source citing them as 75% to 80% of global crypto volume. Bringing them into the U.S. market was meant to shift activity onto regulated venues, but CME’s lawsuit could block or reroute that transition.

The bigger fight - CME also argued that it holds exclusive licenses tied to major benchmarks, meaning rival products may need to route through its infrastructure if courts agree that perps are swaps. The CFTC pushed back sharply, calling the lawsuit “frivolous” and accusing CME of using lawfare instead of competing in the marketplace.

Adam Back pushes Satoshi debate back to 1997

Key points:

  • Adam Back argued that Bitcoin’s proof-of-work foundation was more of a discovery than a pure invention.

  • Back rejected the idea that Peter Todd’s comments confirmed Todd as Satoshi Nakamoto.

News - Adam Back has pushed Bitcoin’s origin story back into the cypherpunk era, arguing that its core design grew from years of research before Satoshi Nakamoto published the white paper in 2008.

The Blockstream CEO and Hashcash inventor said researchers were already discussing decentralized, proof-of-work-based digital cash systems in 1997. His comments came after developer Peter Todd said he had discussed Bitcoin-like ideas with Back and Hal Finney as a teenager while criticizing proposed social media age restrictions in the UK.

Back clarified that Todd’s remarks were not a Satoshi claim. Instead, he pointed to old research communities, including a 1997 cypherpunks mailing list thread and a 2001 exchange between Todd and Finney, as evidence that many of Bitcoin’s building blocks circulated before Nakamoto’s launch.

Why this matters - Back’s broader point was that Bitcoin should not be viewed as a single, isolated invention. He argued that Satoshi’s achievement was solving the double-spending problem while combining earlier ideas, including Hashcash and peer-to-peer cash concepts, into a working protocol.

The bigger debate - Back also compared Bitcoin to mathematical theorems and physical constants, saying its narrow design space made it closer to a discovery than flexible software.

Critics pushed back, arguing that Bitcoin remains a specific implementation with design trade-offs. Either way, the exchange shifted the Satoshi debate from identity hunting toward the deeper question of how much of Bitcoin was discovered, designed, or inherited.

Crypto Moves Fast. Trade What Happens Next.

BTC at $100K? ETH above $3K? Market cap hitting new highs? Kalshi lets you trade on the outcomes you're already watching. Buy "Yes" or "No" shares on crypto milestones — no wallet, no gas fees, no exchange. Just your read on the market. Start with a free $10 and see if you're right.

Trade responsibly.

G7 turns North Korea crypto theft into security fight

Key points:

  • G7 leaders called for joint action against North Korean crypto thefts and cybercrime.

  • Researchers tied DPRK-linked actors to at least $6.75 billion in stolen crypto since 2017.

News - G7 leaders have moved North Korea-linked crypto theft higher on the global security agenda, warning that stolen digital assets are helping fund Pyongyang’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

In a statement adopted at the summit in Évian-les-Bains, France, the group said members needed to jointly address North Korea’s cryptocurrency thefts and cybercrimes. The language expanded earlier G7 warnings by treating DPRK-linked hacking not just as a crypto sector threat, but as part of a broader weapons-financing concern.

The numbers behind the warning were severe. Chainalysis estimated that North Korean hackers stole at least $2 billion in crypto in 2025, pushing the all-time total attributed to DPRK-affiliated actors to at least $6.75 billion. Sources also cited the $1.5 billion Bybit breach in February 2025, which the FBI linked to a North Korean hacking outfit known as TraderTraitor.

Why this matters - The G7 did not announce specific enforcement measures, but the statement pointed toward closer coordination, stronger sanctions enforcement, and efforts to disrupt laundering networks. That leaves exchanges, DeFi protocols, and infrastructure providers facing greater pressure to improve wallet screening, access controls, hiring checks, and incident response.

The security angle - The threat has continued into 2026. TRM Labs reported that two DPRK-linked attacks on Drift Protocol and KelpDAO caused $577 million in losses through April, representing 76% of reported global crypto hack losses so far this year. For policymakers, that made crypto theft a national security problem, not just an industry loss.

Ireland puts crypto firms on financial crime watch

Key points:

  • Ireland launched a new National Risk Assessment and 30-point action plan targeting financial crime risks.

  • The plan calls for enhanced safeguards around crypto assets, digital finance, and source-of-funds checks.

News - Ireland has placed crypto assets under tighter financial crime scrutiny after publishing a new National Risk Assessment on money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing.

The government paired the assessment with a 30-point action plan aimed at strengthening oversight across digital finance, gambling, company ownership transparency, and inter-agency coordination. While Ireland’s overall money-laundering threat remains rated moderate, and terrorist financing is rated low, officials flagged the misuse of crypto assets as part of a wider shift in how criminals combine traditional methods with digital tools.

The plan’s crypto focus includes enhanced safeguards around crypto assets and digital finance. One specific measure tasks the Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland with creating an industry standard for accepting crypto-related activities as a source of funds, including due diligence to verify that money is legitimate. That measure is slated for the second quarter of 2027.

Why this matters - Ireland’s move raises expectations for exchanges, wallet providers, and other virtual asset firms operating in or serving the Irish market. Compliance teams may face more pressure around AML controls, KYC checks, transaction monitoring, suspicious activity reporting, and coordination with regulators.

The MiCA link - The plan also lands as Ireland prepares to fully implement the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA). Under MiCA, the Central Bank of Ireland will supervise Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs), adding EU-wide licensing requirements to national safeguards. For crypto firms using Ireland as a European base, the message is clear: lighter-touch compliance is giving way to a stricter financial crime framework.

You Don't Have to Wait for the SpaceX IPO

The listing is coming. But the investors who'll profit most aren't waiting — they're already in the three public companies with direct SpaceX revenue exposure. Here's what they're buying.

Interesting facts

  • An NFT penguin brand is living inside everyday chats: GIPHY currently lists Pudgy Penguins with 36.2K uploads and 111.1B GIF views, showing how a crypto-native IP project found mainstream reach through reactions, stickers, and memes rather than wallet-first onboarding.

  • Base made usernames expensive before letting them get cheap: As per Base documentation, Basenames launched with a temporary Dutch auction premium starting at 100 ETH and decaying over 36 hours, an anti-bot design for distributing human-readable .base.eth identities.

  • Aave built an insurance trigger that does not wait for a DAO vote: Aave’s Umbrella system lets users stake aTokens or GHO, and if an asset-specific deficit appears, matching staked assets can be burned to offset bad debt without manual governance intervention.

Stop Paying for 6 Tools. One AI Does It All.

Top 3 coins of the day

Stellar (XLM)

Key points:

  • XLM extended to $0.24 after reclaiming the $0.21 to $0.23 area, with Parabolic SAR trailing well below price at $0.18.

  • Zebec’s tGBP payroll integration, Stellar’s $2.3B RWA footprint, and the DTCC mid-2027 tailwind kept traders focused on real-world payment and asset rails.

What you should know:

XLM’s move looked like a utility-led continuation after its mid-June breakout. The token had compressed near $0.18 to $0.19 before reclaiming $0.21 to $0.23 and pushing to $0.24. Parabolic SAR stayed below price at $0.18, keeping the 4H recovery intact, while volume stood at 3.18M. MACD also remained constructive, with the MACD line at 0.0099 above the signal line at 0.0085 and the histogram positive at 0.0014. Zebec’s tGBP payroll integration added a PayFi use case, while Stellar’s $2.3B RWA footprint and Spiko’s $1B deployment strengthened the network’s institutional story. Holding $0.23 keeps $0.25 to $0.27 in view.

Ethena (ENA)

Key points:

  • ENA recovered to $0.0949 after rising from the $0.0685 to $0.071 low, but the lower-high area near $0.098 to $0.10 still needs clearing.

  • Ethena’s $250M Solana CLO evaluation, Janus Henderson tie-up, Coinbase USDC Vault, and Centrifuge partnership strengthened its institutional credit story.

What you should know:

ENA’s rebound still had one checkpoint to clear. After the chart marked a low near $0.0685 to $0.071, buyers pushed through $0.085 and lifted price to $0.0949, just below the lower-high zone at $0.098 to $0.10. Volume stood at 2.78M, while MACD stayed positive, with the MACD line at 0.0029 above the signal line at 0.0022 and the histogram at 0.0007. Away from the chart, Ethena’s planned $250M Solana CLO allocation put its reserves back in focus. Janus Henderson’s ENA exposure and USDe treasury use added institutional validation, while Coinbase’s Ethena-powered USDC Vault and Centrifuge’s credit market pathway broadened the distribution story.

Canton (CC)

Key points:

  • CC held near $0.164 after defending higher lows above $0.16, but the $0.169 to $0.17 lower-high zone still blocks a cleaner continuation.

  • Digital Asset’s $355M raise and the Hifi Finance, DRW, and Marex on-chain repo settlement kept Canton’s institutional infrastructure story active.

What you should know:

CC’s chart showed a steadier hold, not a confirmed breakout. After rebounding from the $0.138 to $0.14 low, price kept defending higher lows and settled near $0.164, still below the $0.169 to $0.17 lower-high ceiling. Volume was modest at 6.52K, so participation has not yet matched earlier rally spikes. DMI leaned positive, with +DI at 22.41 above -DI at 14.96, but ADX at 14.24 showed trend strength was still developing. Digital Asset’s $355M raise kept institutional confidence around Canton alive, while the Hifi Finance, DRW, and Marex on-chain repo settlement showed real Treasury use. DTCC and JPMorgan progress remain longer-term follow-through to watch.

How was today's newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.